The Seven-Year Itch in Translation

The most dangerous drivers, statistically, are those who have had their license for about a year. They start feeling comfortable and relax their vigilance even though they are actually not that experienced yet, leading to a higher accident rate. Similarly, the seven-year mark is reportedly a tricky time in a relationship. The thrill of conquest and romance has worn off and gradually gets replaced, it seems, by bills, annoying nose-blowing habits and demanding in-laws.

Translation careers go through phases as well, some exciting and some not so much, and it’s good to be aware and prepared so you don’t wreck your career through misplaced confidence or throw it all to the wind when difficult times (inevitably) arrive.

I have no evidence to back this up, but I’m guessing the “misplaced overconfidence” phase first rears its head after about the first year of translating for a living. These are some of the signs:

Hypersensitivity/argumentativeness when a client or proofreader comes back with comments on the text. The other day I read a complaint on a forum from a translator whose client was not happy with the translation. She was baffled, she said, because she had been extremely pleased with her own translation when reviewing it before submission. I get it, it’s hard to hear that someone is not totally in love with your beautiful text and it may feel like a personal attack on your competence. But language is not a closed system with a finite amount of black-and-white knowledge. It’s alive, always evolving with infinite variations, and it’s impossible for one human being to always have the best take on everything. In language, it’s hardly ever “my way or the highway”.

We also have to remember that it’s not about us; it’s about creating the best possible text for the context it will be used in, and it’s a sign of maturity, not to mention a matter of retaining your sanity, to let go of disputable matters after you have made your point and the client or the proofreader still doesn’t see it your way. Emphasis on disputable. Some things are not disputable and you absolutely need to stand your ground in those cases, because you don’t want your name associated with an objectively ungrammatical, unidiomatic text.

Taking on assignments that are outside of your area of expertise. This temptation can be especially strong when work is slow and there are bills to be paid. After all, you’re a paid professional now, so with a bit of research you should be okay, right? Let me join the chorus here and entreat you to not engage in this type of unprofessional conduct, no matter how strong the urge. You may get lucky and skate by once or twice, but in the end you will hurt yourself, the client, and ultimately the profession by perpetuating the misconception that translation is a hobby-type activity that anyone could do.

Now fast-forward about 6 years or so, and let’s look at the more seasoned translators. They have established a specialty, a solid core group of clients and a steady income. Except for occasional slow periods, the scramble for survival is a thing of the past and the challenge is mainly to keep growing and learning. It’s all smooth sailing from here, right? Well, there are a few pitfalls to keep in mind.

Mistaking your own habits for required usage. One of the nice things about having years of experience in a particular specialty is that a lot of the terminology becomes second nature and there is less and less you need to research (although, like an asymptote in math, the time spent on research should never actually reach zero). However, a small but noteworthy danger is that a certain term sounds natural, not because it’s the right one, but simply because this is how you have been translating it for years. This just happened to me the other day. I had been writing “acetyl salicylic acid” as three words for years, which seems to make sense because English doesn’t like to combine words like Dutch or German. So when a Trados TM suggested “acetylsalicylic acid” I was a little huffed, until I looked it up and lo and behold, I was the one who had been wrong all these years. This is closely related to the second pitfall:

Unnecessary arrogance/harshness when proofreading a colleague’s work. I confess I get irritated sometimes when I see basic mistakes or sloppiness in a translation supposedly done by a qualified specialist, but I have learned to double-check any terminology I am certain is wrong, because there have been times when the “incorrect” term was actually an acceptable or even commonly used alternative.

Going back to the comparison with relationships, it is very human and common to start seeing the other person as an imperfect version of ourselves, rather than a unique individual with their own perfectly valid, and yes, different, ways of folding laundry and putting the dishes in the dishwasher. As an inveterate rearranger of dishes I confess I’m still working on that one, but in the same way, we need to remember as we become more experienced translators that different is not necessarily wrong.

There is a time for boldness and self-promotion, but we had better make sure continually that we have the goods to back it up. Humility and teachability go a long way towards making sure that confidence does not overtake skill and crash a budding or thriving career.

10 thoughts on “The Seven-Year Itch in Translation

  1. Hello Marie,
    Great thoughts and reminders. Something I am always reminding myself (though I’m not at the 7 year business itch yet) is to always ask questions. If you aren’t sure, ask. If you need help, ask. It’s great to get input from other translators and they’re almost always ready to share their knowledge and experiences.

  2. Hi Jesse, thanks for stopping by 🙂 And yes, good point about asking questions. It has been my experience as well that most translators are more than happy to share their knowledge and help their colleagues so the rest of us don’t have to reinvent the wheel every time!

  3. Excellent post, Marie! One of our worst enemies in translation is Ego. It stops us from opening up to feedback, asking the right questions (as Jesse pointed out above), and more importantly understanding that someone else’s take on our work (be it the end user, client, proofreader, etc.) says nothing about us on a personal level.

    It’s also beneficial to understand that any and all translators in our same market segment or “league” can probably do the job just as well as we can. What sets us apart and keeps our clients happy and loyal is our ability to add value through our service; and that part has to do with our personality, adaptability, and flexibility in a professional setting, among other things.

    • Thanks Paula! So true about ego; I just read your new post and couldn’t agree more about the destructiveness of ego-driven rudeness. That’s why I think it’s so important to nip those kinds of attitudes and thoughts in the bud when they occur in small ways, like when we get irritated while proofreading someone else’s work; it’s so easy to slip into a secret sense of superiority. Like you say, there are always others who can do the job just as well so we would be wise to be as kind and professional as possible in our dealing with others. Thanks for commenting!

  4. I agree that this is one of the pitfalls of working on our own all day, most days, for years. Nobody is here to call us out on our potential mistakes and bad habits! Which is why I love to receive edited versions of my translations. When this has been done by a true professional, I learn more in a few minutes than after hours of research! Being challenged in our practice, even when it’s in a subject we feel confident in, is the best way to improve. I would recommend translation agencies send the edited/proofread translation back to the translator every time. I understand this can cause unwanted discussions on stylistic choices, but it also provides invaluable feedback to translators, who in turn become better at their job, so everybody wins!

    • Hi Chloe, very true! I have also noticed that I tend to be a little more conservative and careful when I know I’m going to be discussing my edits with the translator. As is so obvious on the Internet, rudeness thrives on anonymity, and I guess I’m not immune to that… Discussion is definitely healthy and benefits the quality of our work, whether we’re editing or translating.

    • Hi Chloe, I agree with every word you say about learning from our proofread work. I have been translating for about a year and discovered that there are actual agencies out there who share the proofread version, thus providing an opportunity to grow. What I am doing now is to try to establish a client-base mainly of these agencies, to maximize my development.In my experience, agencies who share proofread versions are actually ready to discuss corrections, at times explicitly asking my opinion. Usually they are the ones who demand high quality, allow for reasonable deadlines and willing to pay higher fees, making collaboration a real nice experience.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s